Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Xeon X5675 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3998 days newer than Xeon X5675.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5675
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 28% better in Lost Ark than Xeon X5675 - 287 vs 224 FPS
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than Intel Xeon X5675 - 58 vs 95 Watts
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
287
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.29/FPS
100%
Price, £
£82.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £82.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5675 | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 58 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |