Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms Xeon X5675 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 3977 days newer than Xeon X5675.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 21% better in Battlefield IV than Xeon X5675 - 452 vs 373 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon X5675 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5675 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
452
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.32/FPS
100%
Price, £
£145
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5675 | vs | Intel Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |