Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7940X outperforms Xeon W3565 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7940X is 2861 days newer than Xeon W3565.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3565
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than Intel Core i9-7940X - 130 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7940X
- Performs up to 5% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Xeon W3565 - 122 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3565 - 28 vs 8 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon W3565
Server/Workstation • Nov 1st, 2009
Core i9-7940X
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3565 | vs | Intel Core i9-7940X |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2017 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 14 |
| 8 | Threads | 28 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
