Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7940X outperforms Xeon E5-2630 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7940X is 1089 days newer than Xeon E5-2630 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7940X
- Performs up to 6% better in Alan Wake 2 than Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 112 vs 106 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 28 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-7940X - 85 vs 165 Watts
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i9-7940X
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Xeon E5-2630 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7940X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
14 | Cores | 8 |
28 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 165 W | TDP | 85 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
