Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7940X outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7940X is 1089 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7940X
- Performs up to 5% better in No Man's Sky than Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 174 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 28 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i9-7940X - 135 vs 165 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-7940X
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7940X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
14 | Cores | 8 |
28 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 165 W | TDP | 135 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
