Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms Xeon W3565 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600X is 2718 days newer than Xeon W3565.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Performs up to 10% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon W3565 - 126 vs 115 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Xeon W3565 - 95 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3565 - 12 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
126
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.42/FPS
100%
Price, £
£178.58
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £178.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 21 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Nov 1st, 2009
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3565 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
---|---|---|
Nov 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 95 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |