Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 5314 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 23% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon W3520 - 234 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3520 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3520 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
234
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.85/FPS
100%
Price, £
£432.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £432.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 253 minutes ago
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3520 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |