Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 4684 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 23% better in Battlefield IV than Xeon W3520 - 454 vs 369 FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon W3520 - 58 vs 130 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
454
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.26/FPS
100%
Price, £
£119.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £119.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3520 | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 58 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |