Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 2284 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 6% better in Fortnite than Xeon W3520 - 224 vs 212 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon W3520 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3520 doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
224
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.36/FPS
100%
Price, £
£80.09
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £80.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3520 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |