Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 3751 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than Xeon W3520 - 201 vs 199 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon W3520 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3520 doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
201
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.37/FPS
100%
Price, £
£72
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3520 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |