Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-3175X outperforms Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-3175X is 22 days newer than Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3175X
- Performs up to 0% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i5-9400F - 243 vs 242 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 56 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3175X - 65 vs 255 Watts
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
242
99%
Value, £/FPS
£0.53/FPS
100%
Price, £
£127.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £127.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jan 30th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-3175X | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 30th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Xeon W | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
28 | Cores | 6 |
56 | Threads | 6 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
255 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |