Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms Xeon E5645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 4018 days newer than Xeon E5645.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 6% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Xeon E5645 - 234 vs 221 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5645 - 65 vs 80 Watts
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
234
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.3/FPS
100%
Price, £
£69.82
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £69.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5645 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |