Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 2288 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5620
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 80 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 4% better in Valheim than Xeon E5620 - 196 vs 189 FPS
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
196
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.25/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 192 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Xeon | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |