Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms Xeon E5520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 4049 days newer than Xeon E5520.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5520
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 80 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 100% better in The Callisto Protocol than Xeon E5520 - 134 vs 67 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5520 - 20 vs 8 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
134
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.01/FPS
100%
Price, £
£270
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15520 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5520 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
Gainestown | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |