Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms Xeon E5-2698 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 2381 days newer than Xeon E5-2698 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 30% better in Diablo IV than Xeon E5-2698 v3 - 196 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 - 65 vs 135 Watts
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
196
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.35/FPS
100%
Price, £
£69.22
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £69.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
135 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |