Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2630 v3 outperforms Xeon E5-2690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2630 v3 is 916 days newer than Xeon E5-2690.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
- Performs up to 3% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E5-2690 - 160 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 - 85 vs 135 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2690 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
135 W | TDP | 85 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |