Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Xeon E5-2690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4800MQ is 419 days newer than Xeon E5-2690.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2690
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4800MQ - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Performs up to 9% better in Minecraft than Xeon E5-2690 - 664 vs 609 FPS
- Consumes up to 65% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 - 47 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2690 doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2690 | vs | Intel Core i7-4800MQ |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
135 W | TDP | 47 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |