Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4130T outperforms Xeon E5-2690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4130T is 544 days newer than Xeon E5-2690.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2690
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130T - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130T
- Performs up to 13% better in Starfield than Xeon E5-2690 - 51 vs 45 FPS
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 - 35 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2690 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2690 | vs | Intel Core i3-4130T |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
135 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |