Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2670 v3 outperforms Core i3-8100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2670 v3 is 1123 days older than Core i3-8100.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-8100 - 176 vs 173 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 65 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
173
98%
Value, £/FPS
£0.35/FPS
100%
Price, £
£59.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 | vs | Intel Core i3-8100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
120 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |