Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-8100 is 1253 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Performs up to 11% better in Ready or Not than Celeron G1840 - 262 vs 236 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i3-8100 - £49.95 vs £69.99
- Up to 22% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i3-8100 - £0.21 vs £0.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i3-8100 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
262
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.27/FPS
77.77777777777777%
Price, £
£69.99
71%
FPS Winner
Buy for £69.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1739 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
236
90.07633587786259%
Value, £/FPS
£0.21/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1738 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
505
40.562248995983936%
Multi-Core
854
25.080763582966227%
Intel Core i3-8100 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |