Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100 outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8100 is 1620 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Performs up to 11% better in Battlefield V than FX-6350 - 233 vs 209 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i3-8100 - £39.99 vs £69.99
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100 - 6 vs 4 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £69.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
Buy for £39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8100 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |