Buy on Amazon
£151
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7600K outperforms Xeon E5-2643 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-7600K is 1764 days newer than Xeon E5-2643.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2643
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600K - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600K
- Performs up to 18% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-2643 - 109 vs 92 FPS
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2643 - 91 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2643 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-7600K
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
109
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.39/FPS
100%
Price, £
£151
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-7600K 3.8 GHz QuadCore 6 MB Cache CPU - Black
Buy for £151 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 166 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2643
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i5-7600K
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2643 | vs | Intel Core i5-7600K |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 91 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 33.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
