Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 1764 days newer than Xeon E5-2620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 146% better in League of Legends than Xeon E5-2620 - 140 vs 57 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 doesn't have integrated graphics
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
140
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.45/FPS
100%
Price, £
£62.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £62.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10291 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |