Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 2971 days newer than Xeon E5-2620.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 18% better in Lost Ark than Xeon E5-2620 - 260 vs 221 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |