Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms Xeon E5-2630 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 2055 days newer than Xeon E5-2630 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 8% better in Lost Ark than Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 260 vs 240 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 65 vs 85 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 16 vs 8 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen 3 3100
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Xeon E5-2630 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Matisse | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 85 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
