Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-14100 is 4325 days newer than Xeon E5-2620.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100
- Performs up to 11% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E5-2620 - 187 vs 169 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
187
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.73/FPS
100%
Price, £
£136.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £136.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 | vs | Intel Core i3-14100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |