Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 3326 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 34% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 159 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 32 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
159
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.73/FPS
100%
Price, £
£433.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £433.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
6 | Threads | 32 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
85 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |