Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600K outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12600K is 2614 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600K - 85 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 24% better in Battlefield 2042 than Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 181 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
181
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.28/FPS
100%
Price, £
£231.48
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £231.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-12600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |