Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 2696 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield 1 than Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 253 vs 231 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 58 vs 85 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 8 vs 6 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
253
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.33/FPS
100%
Price, £
£82.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £82.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 58 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |