Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1840 outperforms Xeon E5-2420 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1840 is 717 days newer than Xeon E5-2420.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2420
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Performs up to 1% better in Far Cry 3 than Xeon E5-2420 - 122 vs 121 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2420 - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2420 doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
122
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.41/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2420 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge-EN | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
2.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 53 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |