Key Differences
In short — FX-4350 outperforms Xeon E5-2420 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4350 is 350 days newer than Xeon E5-2420.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2420
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Performs up to 0% better in Battlefield 1 than Xeon E5-2420 - 229 vs 228 FPS
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2420 | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge-EN | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
2.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |