Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms Xeon E5-2420 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 2753 days newer than Xeon E5-2420 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 16% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2420 v2 - 132 vs 114 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2 - 65 vs 80 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
132
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.52/FPS
100%
Price, £
£69.22
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £69.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 203 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge EN | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |