Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms Xeon E5-1680 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 1410 days newer than Xeon E5-1680 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 6% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Xeon E5-1680 v4 - 133 vs 125 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1680 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
