Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1630 v4 outperforms FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1630 v4 is 1336 days newer than FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4
- Performs up to 13% better in Minecraft than FX-8350 - 679 vs 603 FPS
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E5-1630 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
| Broadwell | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
