Buy on Amazon
£49.95
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $294
Availability
MSRP in USD: $294
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 1295 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 4% better in Death Stranding than Celeron G1610 - 221 vs 213 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 55 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
221
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.23/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Corp. BX80660E51620V4 Xeon Processor E5-1620 v4
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 142 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 140 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
