Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600G outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600G is 1758 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 54% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600G - £49.95 vs £109.0
- Up to 52% better value when playing Forza Horizon 5 than Ryzen 5 5600G - £0.3 vs £0.62 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
- Performs up to 5% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 177 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
168
94%
Value, £/FPS
£0.3/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
Buy for £109 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 5600G |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 13th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Cezanne |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |