Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Xeon E5-1607 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 2126 days newer than Xeon E5-1607 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 8% better in New World than Xeon E5-1607 v2 - 107 vs 99 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |