Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600K outperforms Xeon E3-1285L v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12600K is 2347 days newer than Xeon E3-1285L v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 5% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 166 vs 158 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
166
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.39/FPS
100%
Price, £
£231.48
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £231.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-12600K |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel Iris Pro P6300 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |