Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Xeon E3-1285L v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 2773 days newer than Xeon E3-1285L v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 21% better in Resident Evil 4 than Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 210 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 32 vs 8 threads
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
210
100%
Value, £/FPS
£5.62/FPS
100%
Price, £
£1179.89
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £1,179.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel Iris Pro P6300 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |