Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms Xeon E3-1285L v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 1983 days newer than Xeon E3-1285L v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 13% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 194 vs 172 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 32 vs 8 threads
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
194
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.41/FPS
100%
Price, £
£272.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £272.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel Iris Pro P6300 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |