Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Xeon E3-1280 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 2226 days newer than Xeon E3-1280 v3.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 208 vs 201 FPS
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 65 vs 82 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 12 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
208
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.48/FPS
100%
Price, £
£100.84
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £100.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 346 minutes ago
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1280 v3 | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
82 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |