Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms Xeon E3-1280 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 3404 days newer than Xeon E3-1280 v3.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1280 v3
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 82 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 10% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 337 vs 307 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
337
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.71/FPS
100%
Price, £
£239.45
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £239.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 518 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1280 v3 | vs | Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
82 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |