Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Xeon E3-1275 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 2610 days newer than Xeon E3-1275 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 5% better in Sons Of The Forest than Xeon E3-1275 v2 - 98 vs 93 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2 - 65 vs 77 Watts
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1275 v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Ryzen 3 3200G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 77 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| Intel HD P4000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
