Buy on Amazon
£95.27
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms Xeon E3-1270 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 2844 days newer than Xeon E3-1270 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 9% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E3-1270 v3 - 199 vs 183 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 - 12 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i5-11400F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
199
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.48/FPS
100%
Price, £
£95.27
100%
FPS and Value Winner
INTEL - CLIENT CPU CORE I5-11400F 2.60GHZ SKTLGA1200 12.00MB CACHE BOXED
Buy for £95.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 267 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon E3-1270 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Core i5-11400F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Xeon E3-1270 v3 or Core i5-11400F
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0, 1920 x 1080, Extreme
54 FPS
£16.67/FPS
GeForce GTX 1660
Core i5-11400F
16 GB, 1 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
£899.99
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
