Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2746 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 3% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 155 vs 150 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 35 vs 45 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
155
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.65/FPS
100%
Price, £
£100
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18622 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Athlon |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |