Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 2610 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 14% better in Borderlands 3 than Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 226 vs 198 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 12 vs 8 threads
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Buy for £94.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66725 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Single-Core
562
35.19098309329994%
Multi-Core
1875
27.237071470075534%
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |