Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700 outperforms Xeon E3-1240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-7700 is 2102 days newer than Xeon E3-1240.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700
- Performs up to 8% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E3-1240 - 121 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
121
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.86/FPS
100%
Price, £
£225
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 208 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 | vs | Intel Core i7-7700 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |