Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms Xeon E3-1240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600X is 4195 days newer than Xeon E3-1240.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7600X - 80 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600X
- Performs up to 26% better in Overwatch 2 than Xeon E3-1240 - 407 vs 322 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E3-1240
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Ryzen 5 7600X
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 33.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
