Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms Xeon E3-1240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 4195 days newer than Xeon E3-1240.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 80 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 62% better in New World than Xeon E3-1240 - 160 vs 99 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
160
100%
Value, £/FPS
£6.87/FPS
100%
Price, £
£1099.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £1,099.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 170 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |