Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms Xeon E3-1240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8700G is 4663 days newer than Xeon E3-1240.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
- Performs up to 42% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E3-1240 - 131 vs 92 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1240
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Ryzen 7 8700G
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 8700G |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 33.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
